Why doesn’t Topps baseball cards list the position?

19 of 62 Topps base card designs do not include position on front

All baseball cards have the position listed on the front of the card, right? Nope. Of the 62 base sets that Topps has produced, 19 do not feature the position on the front of the card.

Traditionally, Topps would include the player’s position on the front of the card. For the first 35 years of Topps cards, only two sets didn’t feature the position. 1952 and 1972.

1972 topps - Joe Torre - no position listed

For 19 consecutive years Topps placed the position on the front of the card. For some odd reason the 1972 design broke that streak. Perhaps Topps was too distracted that year by their most hideous design ever with the projecting 3D text.

After 1972 Topps returned back to tradition placing the position on the card for 14 straight years, then came the 1987 set.

1987 topps - mike aldrete - no position listed

A faux wooden background was featured on the card. I like me some faux-wood. I feature it on my site and in my infographics. However, this year Topps started a trend of forgetting to put the player’s position in the design. Perhaps Topps wanted to make their designs more simple. However, I don’t see what’s so hard about include a simple two-character designation somewhere. It’s really simple. P, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, OF, or C. Done.

For 35 years nearly 100% of their designs included the position.

Email newsletter signup

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Greg Raporterikmaldre Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Erik Maldre

I agree with everything you said. It should be the exception and not the rule to remove players’ positions on card fronts. It’s just plain lazy when a standard content element is removed from a design.

I like your info-graphic. It presents the concept very clearly.

Greg Raport
Greg Raport

Topps also seems to have a problem getting positions right, by listing players at positions they did not play or barely played at. [Such as listing Randy Ready as 3B-OF when the only positions he played that season were 2B and OF, or Von Hayes as OF-1B when he did not play 1B at all that season]. If they have access to the rest of a player’s statistics, one would think that they would have access to the number of games a player appeared at a position, then pare it down to the top two or three. Donruss, Score, and Fleer seem to be somewhat more accurate.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes

%d bloggers like this: