Ricketts Wrigley Field mockup vs the real Jumbotron ads mockup

How the advertising will really appear on Wrigley Field's Jumbotron and outfield

The original mockup by the Ricketts makes the outfield advertising look all nice and pretty. The Jumbotron has nice green ads to match the nice green Jumbotron, which matches the original scoreboard. But these are just mockup ads to hide how loud the real advertising will be.

My brother took the Ricketts’ mockup and put advertising from real sponsors of the Cubs. This is what Wrigley Field will look like soon. Check out the real mockup at http://www.unlikelymoose.com/blog/comments/P2073_0_1_0/

My brother says:

I just want the public to be properly informed. It’s interesting how Ricketts is using the threat of moving as a smokescreen to cover up the reality of dump truck advertising he’s dumping into the stadium.

It’s too bad that the Cubs owners have to be deceptive about what the ads will look like. What do you think of the advertising in Wrigley Field? Should we plaster ads all over the park? Are the Ricketts being deceptive with their mockup?

 

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , | Leave a comment

Honus Wagner T206 or two one-million dollar bills?

Which would you rather have? A Honus Wagner T206 baseball card or two one-million dollar bills?

Honus Wagner T206 or two one-million dollar bills?

Someone recently paid $2.1 million dollars for a Honus Wagner card. However, $2,105,770.50 is not the highest every paid for a baseball card. That honor goes to a PSA 8-rated T206 Honus Wagner card for $2.8 million in 2007.

With Honus Wagner going for millions, it seems like his photo should appear on the million dollar bill.

Which would you rather have? The Wagner card or the million dollar bills? You can answer on Quora, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, or in the comments on this blog post. I’ll copy your answer and post it on this list:

  • I would rather have the two million dollar bills, because I bet they are worth more than two million dollars because of their rarity. I’m betting they are worth ten million dollars. [from Matt Maldre]
  • I would rather have two million one dollar bills. [from Scott Backer of Twitter]
  • I would rather have 2m. The card can go to nada very quick. [from Abhay on Instant Messenger]
  • I would rather have the money. I could use it! [front Ellen Levitt on Quora]
  • I would rather have the Honus Wagner card: a million dollar bill doesn’t exist.  [from C.M. Latsha on Quora]
  • I would rather have _______________
  • I would rather have _______________
  • I would rather have _______________

 

Categories: Baseball cards | Tags: | 2 Comments

Why doesn’t Topps baseball cards list the position?

19 of 62 Topps base card designs do not include position on front

All baseball cards have the position listed on the front of the card, right? Nope. Of the 62 base sets that Topps has produced, 19 do not feature the position on the front of the card.

Traditionally, Topps would include the player’s position on the front of the card. For the first 35 years of Topps cards, only two sets didn’t feature the position. 1952 and 1972.

1972 topps - Joe Torre - no position listed

For 19 consecutive years Topps placed the position on the front of the card. For some odd reason the 1972 design broke that streak. Perhaps Topps was too distracted that year by their most hideous design ever with the projecting 3D text.

After 1972 Topps returned back to tradition placing the position on the card for 14 straight years, then came the 1987 set.

1987 topps - mike aldrete - no position listed

A faux wooden background was featured on the card. I like me some faux-wood. I feature it on my site and in my infographics. However, this year Topps started a trend of forgetting to put the player’s position in the design. Perhaps Topps wanted to make their designs more simple. However, I don’t see what’s so hard about include a simple two-character designation somewhere. It’s really simple. P, 1B, 2B, 3B, SS, OF, or C. Done.

For 35 years nearly 100% of their designs included the position. For the next 27 years, it fell off a cliff down to only one-third. Topps would forget the position 17 times.

  • Before 1987: 94% of the sets featured the position (33 of 35)
  • After 1987: 37% included the position (10 of 27)

Perhaps Topps thinks that fans don’t care what position players play. Or maybe Topps thinks that fans already know all the players. Topps either think fans are too stupid or too smart to care. Today I fall into the “stupid” camp as I barely know any of the players. But many fans, including myself do care. We want to know the positions. I’d say I don’t know baseball players as much today because I don’t collect cards as much as I did in the 80s.

Baseball cards helped me learn the player’s position.

Perhaps Topps thinks that it’s good enough to list the player’s position on the back of the card. But who looks at the back of the card? When you display a card on your bulletin board, do you have the back showing? No. When you see baseball cards online, do you see the back of the card featured? No.

Topps needs to return back to their traditions and include the player’s position on the front of the card. Do you want to see the position return to the front of the card? If so, please leave a comment below.

Categories: Baseball cards | 1 Comment

Infographic: Baseball players on twitter

How many players on your favorite baseball team are on twitter? Baseball-reference.com made official twitter lists for each team. The average number of players on twitter per team is seven.

Baseball teams with the most current players on twitter:
The Boston Red Sox and Tampa Bay Rays have 13 apiece.

Baseball teams with the least number of players on twitter:
The Brewers have two players. The Chicago Cubs have a mere one player, Edwin Jackson ‏@EJ36 with his first year on the Cubs. What’s happening with the Cubs? One player? Yipes.

The American League outnumbers the National League 118-92.
Interestingly, the East divisions in both the NL and AL have the most players. It must be that East Coast media that hypes up players to join twitter. The West and Central divisions all have roughly the same number of players.

Infographic: MLB players on twitter

I was thinking about pulling the OPS for all the batters and displaying if the players on twitter are above the MLB median for OPS. Perhaps I could pull the WAR stats as well. What other stats could be included in the next infographic on baseball and twitter? Some ideas:

  • Number of years per player in pro ball
  • OPS
  • Number of tweets (just because a player is on twitter, doesn’t mean the player tweets)
  • Number of @replies (which players are the most active in responding to others)
  • Followers
  • Which player is followed the most by other MLB players? (that would be really interesting to see which player is followed most by his peers)

If you have any ideas for what stats I should pull for the next MLB-twitter infographic, please leave your suggestions in the comments. Thanks!

Categories: Stats | 4 Comments

Sammy Sosa 3d baseball card

Sammy Sosa 1996 Sportflix UC3 #104 Cubs

Continuing the fun with 3D baseball cards, my brother found this 1996 Sammy Sosa Sportflics card on eBay. I was so taken aback by the delight of seeing Sammy Sosa in 3d, that I sent a message to the seller of this card.

question about Sammy Sosa 3d baseball card

Hi tommybill100,
Sammy Sosa in 3D!? That’s like a real life Sammy Sosa! If I buy this card, does that mean Sammy Sosa will visit me at home?

What will tommybill100 say in response?

UPDATE: tommybill100 has responded! Read what he said in the comments.

Categories: Baseball cards | Tags: , , , | 3 Comments

7 reasons why the Buster Posey 3D card is cool (2013 Topps Opening Day #ODS-4)

“What’s special about a buster posey card?” Question from Erik Maldre.
Answer: Buster Posey in 3D!

3d baseball cards are back! Back in 1986 Sportflics made cards that changed photographs when you moved the card. I never understood why they didn’t make the player animate. Why put three random photos on a card? Or why not make the card 3d?

With lenticular technlogy (the same tech that powered the 1986 Sportflics), you can make a photograph appear to be in three dimensions. The 2013 Topps Opening Day uses this technology to show off 3d photos. I love lenticular. When you move, the image in the card moves.

Wouldn’t it be cool to make lenticular photos? I’d like to shoot 3d images of Chicago. There’s a WOW factor to 3d lenticular photography. This Buster Posey card has that WOW. It’s hanging in my cube, like buster posey is in my cube with me.

But really? Buster Posey? Blerg. At least 3D is awesome. So are the San Fransicso Giants. Those two things makes up for it being Buster Posey. In fact, instead of thinking of it being Buster Posey, think of it as the San Fransciso Giants catcher.

Let’s summarize. Why the 2013 Topps Opening Day card #ODS-4 is cool:

  1. It’s 3d lenticular
  2. San Fransicso Giants
  3. Catcher. Catchers are cool.
  4. 2013 Topps Opening Day. These cards are the coolest, most-best cards created in 2013. Why? Because they are a buck a pack. YES, KIDS. Affordable cards are cool.
  5. I was able to get a special 3D card from an affordable pack.
  6. The design. My brother noted, “It’s neat that his foot is on the front side of the graphic and his other foot is behind it. That’s a nice card. Very nice.”
  7. It’s crazy. When I move in my chair at work, there’s a baseball card on my wall that changes as I move.
Buster Posey 3D 2013 Topps Opening Day #ODS-4 baseball card Buster Posey 3D 2013 Topps Opening Day #ODS-4 baseball card
Buster Posey 3D 2013 Topps Opening Day #ODS-4 baseball card Buster Posey 3D 2013 Topps Opening Day #ODS-4 baseball card

For all my friends who are baseball fans, I’m gonna buy a bunch of 2013 Topps Opening Day packs and give a pack to each friend. If you are reading this blog post, and you didn’t get a pack, let me know.

Categories: Baseball cards | Tags: , , | 4 Comments

The peak years of my card collecting when cards were simply cardboard

The peak years of my card collecting when cards were simply cardboard

This is humbling. All these 1989 sets for only $24 total.

1989 and 1990 were the peak years of my brother and I collecting baseball cards. The years when all the card companies over-produced a ton of cards so they are worth nothing now. But that’s fine with me. I’m glad that the cards are readily available. Collecting cards is fun. It should be affordable.

Now the question is to purchase this collection or not. That’s a lot of card to store! :)

(The original photo is from store.cardsone.com)

Categories: Baseball cards | 2 Comments